Monday, January 28, 2013

IT MUST BE LONELY TO BE GOD

Now that Minneapolis has some snow on the ground, and especially on the trees, the world is brilliant and beautiful.  We need the moisture to help our long-term drought, and if it’s going to be below zero, as it will later in the week, it seems right to have snow on the ground to hug the earth and brighten our eyes.  Last week, it actually stayed below zero for more than a day (the first time in over four years), but the ground was mostly hard chunks of dirty ice, and bare patches of grass.  Not good for our small fruit trees resting in the earth.

Today made me think of a poem I wrote over 30 years ago, when we used to have brilliantly bright sunny days with highs of 15 or even 20 below, and the whole world seemed to be on fire:
TRANSFIGURATION

Today is a cold stillness
broken only by clouds of smoke
pouring from warm, internal worlds.
The sun, afire with eternal Love,
burns every snowflake to a sun.
Consumed by fire, yet cold, yet still,
snow dances in eyes.
Eyes bleed white tears.
“You cannot see my face,”
God said to Moses,
“For man shall not see me and live.”
Today, the earth clothed in white,
images God’s beauty, God’s power,
God’s loneliness.

To some of my Christian friends, and probably some of other faiths, it may seem strange to think of God’s loneliness.  Because if we do, then we have to admit God’s need.  And that gets scary for us, because it means that maybe God is not Omnipotent as we believe. My reading of the bible shows that omnipotence is a foreign concept, borrowed more from the Greeks than from Scripture.  I can see a God in the Bible who is All-Mighty, but standing before that, I see a God who is All-Love.  And love makes us vulnerable.  Love wounds us, when it is not received, and sometimes even more when it is. Ask your own life to see if that is true.

Part of my work is to encourage people, inspire them to follow God.  I won’t stop doing that, and I hope that our little church on the corner of 28th Street and 15th Ave. and the church throughout world is incredibly inviting people to follow God.  But today, at least, with the earth clothed in white, I think that what God needs and desires more than anything is not just followers of God, but friends and lovers of God, filled with the same fiery passion that God is.
To speak more of this would be folly, I dare say.  But I would like to hear what you think. 

One of the poets who first got me to write was Gwendolyn Brooks, and I love her poem:
The Preacher: Ruminates behind the Sermon

I think it must be lonely to be God.
Nobody loves a master. No. Despite
The bright hosannas, bright dear-Lords, and bright
Determined reverence of Sunday eyes.

Picture Jehovah striding through the hall
Of His importance, creatures running out
From servant-corners to acclaim, to shout
Appreciation of His merit’s glare.

But who walks with Him?––dares to take His arm,
To slap Him on the shoulder, tweak His ear,
Buy Him and Coca-Cola or a beer,
Pooh-pooh His politics, call Him a fool?

Perhaps––who knows––He tires of looking down.
Those eyes are never lifted. Never straight.
Perhaps sometimes He tires of being great
In solitude. Without a hand to hold.

Note the title.  I first read this poem when I was an agnostic, but wondering about my vocation.

Go play in the snow!
 
Be power.  Be love.  Be a friend.

Patrick

Monday, January 21, 2013

GUNS DON’T MAKE SECURITY, PEOPLE DO

I and people I know have been victims of crime. I’ve had my house and car broken into; I’ve had people make terroristic threats against me.  Neighbors and members of congregations I’ve served have been murdered.  Too many women I know have been raped and molested.  This hasn’t happened just in inner cities where I’ve served, but also in my hometown of Austin, Minnesota.  I am not naïve about the presence of crime in our society, and in the hard choices we have to make to combat it.
I also have been involved in community anti-crime efforts in neighborhoods in Chicago, the Bronx, Philadelphia and Minneapolis.  In an ideal world, we would not need armed police who have the right to use deadly force when warranted.  We would all live in peace.  But we don’t live in an ideal world, and until we do, we will need to have armed police forces.  Nor am I naïve about how the police have too often abused the office they hold, through brutality, profiling, or in the case of the urban communities I’ve served, a kind of neglect.
I’ve had the opportunity to be involved in different community policing efforts, some of which were more effective than others.  The most important thing that has worked—which has been validated in various studies—is the strength of the neighborhood.  This includes strong community institutions, decent city services, and neighbors knowing each other and caring about each other.  While the number of police that serve a community is important, it’s even more important how they serve a community.  Do they see themselves as an occupying force, where they don’t know who is friend or foe, or do they see the community as an ally?  If you talk to any police leaders, they will emphasize over and over how important community involvement is.  (One of the negative results of our broken immigration system is that immigrants tend to report crimes and testify at a much lower rate than the general population.)
I write this as background because I want to challenge the narrative in this country that guns and firepower are what makes us safe.  That narrative has some basis in fact: we didn’t defeat the Nazis with good words, but with incredible firepower, and at great sacrifice.  But firepower alone just won’t win any war—in Viet Nam, we dropped more bombs on that tiny country than all the armies did everywhere in World War II.  We propped up a corrupt and violent regime in the south of Vet Nam that did not have the support of the people.
I don’t think the problem of gun violence in our country is just too many guns or guns in the hands of the wrong people, although that is true. The problem is deeper: we have a faith in guns that has become a key part of a national narrative, a narrative that has incredible political and social power to thwart change. Look at how much of our story we tell about ourselves revolves around arms:  the Minutemen, the cowboy, the Calvary riding in to save the day, the sheriff in the “wild west”, Rambo and Dirty Harry.  On Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day and at the Super Bowl and World Series, politicians and actors and regular citizens thank the troops “for keeping us free”.   This despite the fact that our military invasions of Vietnam and Iraq and other places have not made us freer in any sense.
This story of the gun has gotten louder since the Newtown school shootings.  The Guns Across America rallies, the NRA President and members of Congress have hit the same notes:  individuals need guns for protection, individuals have a right to purchase and own any gun they like, and that government, especially Obama, is “trying to take away our guns”.  There’s one more claim that I want to focus on. That is the one that says we need individuals to have guns because that’s the only defense we have against a tyrannical government, and that the 2nd amendment is there to protect us against government tyranny.
That might have made sense in the early days of the nation, with a population that was scattered far and wide from any effective police power.  And it made sense in terms of what we had experienced under England’s power.  But does it make sense today? I don’t think so, for a number of reasons.
The first is that—going back to my point about community policing—guns alone do not provide for security, neither against one’s own government nor against foreign enemies.  You need a sense of national unity and purpose, and a government that is able to enforce the law and organize a response.  Saddam Hussein gave guns to his people, but that hardly prevented his tyranny.  And to the idea that we don’t really need a national government, as long as the people are armed?  Look at Somalia.
Another is that part of living in civilization, despite its shortcomings, is that we have to give up some individual rights, in order to have peace and order.  We can’t have “the people” deciding guilt and innocence (remember lynching?); we need a court system. Giving up most use of lethal force to a regulated police force is necessary to have any sense of security.  On top of that, our democratic system is based on the consent of the governed. If we lose that, guns are not going to save us.  If we can’t accept our government as legitimate when our candidate or party doesn’t win the election, we’re playing with fire.
I think that is what is really at stake here.  People’s discontent with their government is nothing new.  But it has been fanned by well-funded and astute groups into a belief that the federal government is the enemy. A real enemy, not a metaphor to win elections.
When I was 19, I had a summer job working for the county.  1972. We drove every county road and every town and city street inventorying abandoned autos.  We would tag and photograph them, plot them on a map and talk to the owners about a free program to haul them away.  We met some folks that weren’t too happy with us (you don’t mess with a man’s horse, even if it’s a metal one with 280 horses). 
One afternoon, two men snuck up on our car as we were having lunch under a little grove of trees off a dirt road.  It was clear that they had guns somewhere on them, but thankfully they didn’t pull them.  I remember one saying, “We were planning to give you what you were looking for.  If you were looking for help, we’d give you help.  If you were looking for trouble, we’d give you that.”  Colorful guys.
As we talked with them, the conversation got more colorful.  One of them told me that he kept his most of guns hidden, and that he stayed away from the county courthouse, because they had installed machine gun placements in the basement windows to fire on the citizens of the county after they took their guns away from them.  “I have proof”, he said.  “They are coming to get us, but we’ll be ready.”
Those people were considered loonies in those days.  Real kooks.  Now people on talk radio, on Fox News and even in Congress spout those kind of ideas. That’s a real danger to our republic.
I would like the people who claim no control of guns is permitted under the 2nd amendment to answer this question: If the 2nd Amendment confers an absolute right to individuals to possess any firearm, then why is it illegal for people to own rocket propelled grenade launchers or flamethrowers?  Those are arms used in the defense of the country.  As are tanks, bombers and the like.  Because we know that in a civilized country, we need to have limits on individual rights when they negatively affect the community.  The same way the first amendment right of free speech does not include terroristic threats or slander, and the first amendment right of freedom of religion does not include human sacrifice, although some religions have practice that.  I’m glad that the first amendment is written in absolute terms—“Congress shall make no law…”  It puts the burden on restricting those rights, and restricting rights should not be taken lightly.  But no one could reasonably claim that the first amendment protects child sacrifice or lying under oath.  Nor should the second amendment be used as a club to stop any kind of control for the good of the public.
I usually sign off by writing “Be Justice.  Be Beauty.” or a variation on that theme. I don’t mean this absolutely, because we need to be constantly vigilant with our trust, but tonight, as we remember Dr. King, and hope for real change in our politics, I encourage us to
Trust Justice.  Trust Beauty.
Patrick

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I Wake to Sleep

I wake to sleep and take my waking slow.
I learn by going where I have to go.

Those lines by Theodore Roethke got me started writing poetry almost 39 years ago, and I have thought about them a lot lately.   The second line is easier to define (and therefore possibly limit): it’s a statement that is reflected in a lot of theories of education, and in songs like the one based on a poem by Antonio Machado called: Caminante, No Hay Camino...se hace el camino al andar, golpe a golpe, verso a verso (Wayfarer, there is no way, we make the way by walking, blow by blow, verse by verse)

The first line is different: it starts with a contradiction, and ends with praise. You might wonder why I said “praise” instead of a commitment or action.  I wonder too!  But as I wrote the word “praise” out, it seemed to ring true.  Praise being a movement of the whole being, the whole body and spirit towards something powerful, just and beautiful.  What do you think?

I’m trying not to commit the cardinal sin of  poetry, which is trying to nail down what a poem or a line or an image means. If I try to figure out what “I wake to sleep” means, I would either go crazy or beat the living mystery out of it. 

One way to engage that line is to say that in some fundamental ways, our country has been asleep for a long, long time—to the violence in our midst, to global warming, to growing inequality.  Unfortunately, when we have had these little episodes of waking, we often wake up on the wrong side of the bed!  That is, we wake up mad, and start looking for scapegoats to blame.  We blame the media, we blame immigrants, we blame the government, we blame the big corporations, we blame the right, we blame the left.  The anger we feel may convince us that it is righteous anger, but it’s not leading to much fundamental change.

For the last twelve days, my wife and I have been teaching an immersion class for seminary students in our neighborhood.  It is supposed to be intense, and to give them a sense for multicultural ministry.  There’s a limit on what you can do in 15 days (we go until the end of the week), but we’ve been trying to push that limit as far as we can.  They’ve met with community leaders in education, business, health, the arts and social services; have gone to various events, and helped with worship.  But the most important part of the course is hearing the story of people in the community, particularly those of the poor, and especially the story of immigrants and their lives here in the land of the free.  Some of the students have not heard stories like the ones they’ve heard, and are—we hope—beginning to look at ministry in a new way.

It is hard for me to listen to voices, especially when they are shouting, if I disagree with their point of view.  I imagine I’m not alone in that.  I have been trying for the last year and a half to at least try and see the person and listen to their story.  Many times I’ve had to listen for their story, that is, to seek out what might be their own story of struggle and pain behind the points they are trying to make.

On the top of my morning devotion page, I’ve written a couple of phrases to help guide my day.  They originated from sermons I preached where I knew I wasn’t really living what I proclaimed.  One says “end of the line”.  The idea there is that if I’m in the back of the line, my self-interest is more in line with an idea of justice that says everyone should share in abundance. (Try this at the next church pot luck you go to).

Another says, “love your enemies”.  That’s there because Jesus told me to, and because I don’t want to.

The third one says “compassion first”.  My hope there is that whomever I encounter, whomever I look at, even and especially someone attacking me, I will see them first with compassion, and treat them first with compassion. That has been a slow waking to sleep, but I can say that it has made a difference in my relationship with people.  I don’t always get the “first” part, but it helps me even when I remember to look with compassion after I’ve looked with anger or judgment.

I don’t think compassion is the only answer, and I think anger, when it’s depersonalized and focused on an injustice needs to be part of how we make change.  The play of those two are never simple. I’ve seen the first two episodes of “The Abolitionists” on PBS, and look forward to the third one.  Compassion alone didn’t win the day on slavery, but it did help move the country to a place where action was possible.  Unfortunately, the action ended up being the terrible violence of the Civil War. 

I don’t know where this is leading, and I would rather let it rest there.

Be beauty. Be justice.  Be angry, but be compassionate.

Patrick

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

We Belong to the Land

I’ve been reading two wonderful books that deal with the loss of land, and how that affects our sense of self, of community and even of nationhood or “people-hood”.  One is Spirit Car by Diane Wilson, which tells of her journey to understand her Lakota roots.  It was the Minneapolis Reads book in 2012, timed, I suppose, to coincide with the war of 1862.  That war and its causes are still troubling the land we walk on, in ways we don’t—or won’t—acknowledge.  What does it mean that we live on land in Minnesota that was taken by theft and war from the people who lived here for centuries?  There have been some great articles and TV shows about this during the past year, but I still think it’s hard for us to have an honest discussion about what that means, especially to those who lost.  On the rare occasions that I’ve been in diverse groups where we talk about it, I’ve heard people of European descent, like me say things like, “I didn’t steal land from anyone”, or “My family came here long after this.”  True, to be sure, and true for me and my family, but not the whole truth,

It is also painfully true, that except for a few functionaries killed at the beginning of the war (who had a big hand in creating the conditions that led to the war); almost all of the white victims were not the rich and powerful.  Rather, they were mostly immigrants who were working incredibly hard to farm the land and make a living and a life in a society that was strange to them, and not always welcoming.

The other book I am reading is We Belong to the Land, by Elias Chacour.  He is an Israeli Palestinian Christian priest and bishop, and you can tell by the combination of the words describing him that he embodies the terrible conflict in Israel and Palestine.  He talks about the pain of having his village taken from his family in the aftermath of the 1948 war, and how the Israeli government, and many Israelis, refuse to recognize the rights of Palestinians to be in the land of their forefathers (and fore-grandmothers and great-great and so on, back hundreds of years).  He is an Israeli citizen, living in the land of Israel, but not able to get building permits, for example, for schools that teach everyone—Israeli and Palestinian, Muslim, Christian, Jew.  He has sought a non-violent way to resist the occupation in a non-violent way and to work for reconciliation, particularly with enemies. 

Both of the books made me think about my relationship to the land, as the grandchild of immigrants on my father’s side, and the great-great-great-great grandson (I think!) on my mother’s side, and a city boy who loves to garden and be in nature, but a boy who couldn’t wait to get away from his hometown, a town surrounded by farm country, and sustained, in many ways by agriculture, specifically meatpacking.

That was a 71-word sentence, in case you’re counting!

Even as I age—I’ll be 60 in April—I want more and more to be in direct contact with the earth on which I walk. I love eating fruits and vegetables that we grow in our backyard, the backyard now lovingly covered in snow, and crisscrossed by rabbit and crow tracks, who are helping fertilize next year’s tomatoes, maybe without knowing it.  (37 words!)  I love teaching youth in our church and in the neighborhood school about gardening, and seeing the joy they get from digging in the dirt, and from eating what they’ve planted and tended to.

And yet, I feel we are missing something profound, even as we see the peril of climate change, and make some small steps to address it (which will not be enough, until we make much bigger ones).  I think there is a body-memory and a land-memory that we have lost, and we have not done the mourning, both individually and communally, that would enable us to grow anew.

Thomas Merton, one of my most favorite poet/priests, writes somewhere (it may be in Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander) about how much of America’s anxiety and conflict is due to our lack of conscious acknowledgement and grief about the pain that made this land what it is.  He makes the point that in our land and in our culture the wounds of slavery and the extermination of native nations still fester (I would add the treatment of immigrants, whether they came from Ireland in the mid-19th century, Scandinavia in the late 19th, or Germany and Russia in the 20th). (52!)

He wrote that in the 1960’s, when civil rights were at the forefront. He also connected this lack of grieving (and repentance, finally) to our war-making in other lands.  I think both are true today.  If we sing “this land is your land, this land is my land” in our classrooms, then we should know the pain as well as the joy of what made this land what it is.

I don’t know about your story, and how you got to where you are.  I bet it involves migration in some way.  And if it does, it involves pain.  My dad’s father, left his Germanic homeland in the early part of the 20th century, in part to escape conscription into the army (and we know what the first half of the century meant for those armies).  He was abandoned by his mother and stepfather, but made it to North Dakota where his sisters lived, and began farming.  No doubt he longed for the soil and the smell and the taste of his native land.  Maybe he sang “some of the songs” of his natal Zion.  I imagine there were some long nights of longing as he “settled” into this new land.

Like many of his generation, he tried to become “American” as soon as possible.  He sped up this process when his 5-year old first born, little Walter, my father, went to kindergarten in 1917, speaking only German, as was told that he could speak only English, not the language of the enemy.  Rules were enforced physically in those schools, in those days.  I imagine little Walter walked home slowly with a load of shame on his back, not because he did something wrong, but because the powers had decided that he and “his kind” were wrong. 

His father said that night: “From now on, we speak only English here!”  Probably he thought he was protecting his children, and he was. But he was also cutting off the language of their infancy, the most important connection to the land where their ancestors walked.  Language develops in a specific place on the earth, then changes and redevelops as it comes in contact with other lands, other tongues.

I wonder how much of that loss was passed onto me and my siblings.  I wonder how much that has happened to so many of us in this land.

Most of the immigrants who came to the United States voluntarily in the past two centuries lost their language pretty quickly. (African slaves had it beaten and starved out of them, and yet still it echoes in our collective music today).  Most of what remains of Scandinavian-American culture or Irish-American culture are the more quaint and non-threatening-ones: special foods at holidays, special clothes you wear once or twice a year, holiday songs.  Hardly a breath of the struggle of the people who came here, their longing for freedom and justice, their sacrifice.

Maybe it’s time to arouse that breath. Maybe it’s time to call all of us to give more than lip service to the belief that we came from the earth and will return to it, and that we are not separate from the very dirt we walk on.  I look out and see trees that were here before I was, and will be—I hope—after I’m gone.  In a few minutes, hundreds and hundreds of crows will gather in their nightly sunset communion.  It makes me sad that one day I won’t be able to see or hear them.  But at least for this moment, I rejoice that my life is so connected with this beautiful earth.

My heart is pretty heavy this early evening about the pain of what a divided land is doing to us and our hope.  A family close to us, whose members were all born in America—some in North American, some in Latin America—are being kept apart by immigration laws that respect neither people nor the land.  I’m going to end this with a poem that talks about another family in our community, and what they suffered. I do so in mourning, but also in hope that speaking this sorrow will somehow lead to a new way, a new life for us.

 Be justice. Be beauty. Be earth.

 Patrick

 
KEEP MOVING


We belong to the dust, the dust
belongs to no one.  Ask the bones
of Domingo, who crossed into Arizona
with his six-year old son, walking
through the mountains, avoiding
the desert snakes and the eyes
burning a hole through the sky.                      
On the third day, they ran
out of water, and on the fourth
Domingo began to run out, his skin
tightening, his eyes wandering
through heaven and earth, the heaven
you make in your mind when flesh                 
begins to die, skin for skin,
bone to its bone, the heart’s fierce                  
surrender.  There comes a moment
in time where the mind can accept
what the body knows.  We belong
to the sun, the sun belongs to no one.
Domingo placed his right hand
on his son’s head, drew a crooked cross,
commanded him on.  The son
obeyed with his feet. The last order
of the living is the first wish of the dead:

Keep moving.