‘Tis
the season to remember the poor again. Especially
the poor kids we love to love so much. Some of us remembered them with
backpacks at the beginning of the school year.
Some of us remembered them with scholarships to summer camp. We
remembered them and their families at Thanksgiving with turkey dinners around
town. And now the biggest remembrance of
them all: it’s toy time for the poor children, so that “they can have a
brighter holiday”.
Pardon
my cynicism. Actually, I don’t want you
to pardon it. I want you to embrace
it. It’s this seasonal remembrance that
punctuates our year-long amnesia about poverty in our midst that is the most
cynical of operations. I have no doubt
that many of us are motivated by feelings of good will when we bring a toy to “Toys
for Tots” or our office charity event. I
don’t doubt that it makes people feel good—usually the people who give the
toy. I just think it can do more harm
than good.
Transparency
alert:
I’m
not writing this as someone who is absolutely clean of toys for poor kids, in
order to celebrate a poor kid born in a barn. Tomorrow, we will help around 100
families participate at Lutheran Social Services Holiday Store, where parents
can buy—for a small amount—gifts for their children; and children can buy—again
at a small amount—gifts for their parents.
I’m grateful for the gifts that were donated for this store, and those
who did the donating. And I’m not
opposed to just plain giving people stuff, nor do I think that BUYING is the
supreme value in life. But the Holiday
Store does see poor people as having something to give, and not just as objects
of charity.
(“But
we like giving to charity!” Why? Do we find it effective? Does it reduce poverty or bring healing? If
we are truly interested in helping people, why don’t we “give” to justice, or “give”
to development, both of which get at root causes. Or better, why don’t we “live” justice and “live”
radical hospitality with all people.)
These
are some of the bromides[i] I’ve
heard about the annual REMEMBRANCE OF THE TOY KING!
“Help
a child by giving them the only toy they’ll receive this Christmas”. I seriously doubt it. I’ve worked in neighborhoods that are
economically poor for over 30 years, and almost every kid gets toys. Many families living in poverty are awash in
the same mania of toys—including digital, expensive toys—that everyone else
is. True, there are a few families who
are so poor the children may not have any new toys this Christmas. But usually
that means they also don’t have enough food or warmth or housing, either, and a
toy isn’t going to brighten their Christmas any.
“Help
brighten up a needy child’s Christmas”. As
if poor people can’t celebrate Christmas without our help! Have you noticed how poor people celebrate
Christmas? Birthdays? Quinceañeras? June Teenth?
Mother’s Day and Father’s Day?
They are usually not skimpy celebrations! (Sometimes they can go into debt for bash,
which is a whole ‘nother issue). There’s
almost always an abundance of food, of people, of warmth. Most celebrations are real celebrations. It is perhaps those of us who are not poor
who could learn how to celebrate Christmas by hanging out with people who are. We might learn something about hospitality
and rejoicing.
(While
we’re on the subject, I would love to see someone create a manger scene that
reflects how communities of poverty respond to birth. Usually scenes of the manger where Jesus was
born are chillingly antiseptic—in a barn!—with Mary radiantly otherworldly,
Joseph stoic, and a few clean shepherds at a safe distance. I have a feeling that the first Christmas was
a lot more chaotic and dynamic than that, with lots of people in Bethlehem
showing up to help. Señora Hernandez
starting slapping tortillas on a big comal.
Sister Williams got a big pot of greens going. Huck brought his banjo, and Grace brought her
violin, and Afaa brought out his drums, and the kids were playing stickball and
soccer in the street. They even gave a
plate of food to the soldiers standing guard in the cold. That’s how I imagine Christmas first went,
and how I hope it will go for us this year!)
(My
siblings will remember the manger scene my father made out of chicken wire,
paper maché—a Judean hillside, with real dirt and real corn and grass growing,
with paths leading up to the holy cave.
One of the first poems I ever wrote was about that (I hope I can find it
someday!) I remember the first lines went like this:
“Jesus
was born dirt poor,” my father said,
and
then he hauled in the dirt.)
More
bromides for Polyphemus:
“Give
them a Christmas to remember.” Poor
people who celebrate Christmas don’t forget it.
And those who don’t celebrate Christmas almost always have another
remembrance that gives them hope.
Usually those remembrances go beyond the surface happiness of a good
time with presents and food, and include a longing for hope in the midst of
struggle. And isn’t that what the whole
Christmas story is about? A poor family
having to leave their town, due to global forces, travel to a place they are
not welcomed, be pursued by a rage filled king who kills innocent children—and yet,
in the midst of that, this marvelous promise of shalom on earth? The joy of those who remember is grounded in
a struggle for life. On a weekend in
which we remember Nelson Mandela (Oh Lord, help us not to forget him! And help us to remember that our nation
branded him a terrorist, and gave guns to the South African military), let us
remember that this most joyful man—a radiant smile, bright eyes, welcoming
voice—had his joy forged in injustice and imprisonment. And yet he never lost
hope.
One
more thing: “Toys for Tots” is a program of the US Marines, and every night now
on the NBC affiliate here in Minneapolis you’ll see people and businesses
bringing their toys and checks to present to a Marine in full dress blues. What will Herod think of next?! I have nothing against those men and women
who serve in the military, often at great sacrifice. I do have a problem with thus “remembering”
the poor during the season dedicated to the Prince of Peace who suffered violence
at the hands of an empire’s army who was known for invading and occupying
countries poorer than them. Both my
parents served in World War II, and my dad saw some very difficult combat. I’m proud of them both, but I ask why every
country we’ve invaded since then has been poorer than us? I will pray this Christmas that someday the
proud marine will stand on TV in dress blues—blue overalls—with his sword
beaten into a plow, ready to plant. (Isaiah 2)
If
you give a toy to a child this Christmas—or if you don’t—ask yourself these two
questions: Why am I doing this—who benefits? Why do we live in a world where we
think that is needed?
That’s
three questions (!), and I’m sure there are more.
Be
Justice this holiday time—and not just charity
Be
Beauty this special time—a beauty that can encompass grief
Be
Cynical—but be hopeful
Patrick
[i]
Here’s the
definition of bromide I found on-line: 1) a drug that makes a person calm,
2) a statement that is intended to make people feel happier or calmer but that
is not original or effective.
This is fantastic! Thank you Patrick! IAOAP as we use in email shorthand here (I agree on all points).
ReplyDeleteOnce again, you have brought us back to the real meaning of the Word. Thanks, Pat.
ReplyDelete