TODAY
IS PEARL HARBOR DAY
When
my mother died and we were cleaning out her house, we found some things of my
father’s that she had stored away. One
was a program for a banquet when he was serving in the army in the Aleutian
Islands in Alaska. I don’t have it right
in front of me, but what I remember is that it had the menu, it had the
invocation, the speaker, the national anthem and so forth. It was dated December 7, 1941. I am sure that
the banquet was canceled. What happened to the food is anyone’s guess. What happened to everyone on that island is
not hard to figure out. All of those men
were touched, and transformed by the war that was to follow.
My
father, like many men of his generation, did not talk a lot about the war. One story he had told to all of the family
was that he was in the Aleutians—closer to Japan than Hawaii was—because of the
whim of his commander. There were two
National Guard units from Minnesota that were called up in late 1940 or early
1941. Whether dad’s C.O. had seniority
or not, and therefore got his wish, his wish had to relate to killing. But not
of humans. He was a hunter, and chose
Alaska, because he always wanted to shoot a Kodiak bear. I don’t know if he did or not, and my father
has been dead now 16 years, so I can’t ask him.
The
other unit was sent to the Philippines, and I wonder how many of them came back
alive. They must have arrived there in
time for the Bataan Death March, in which so many prisoners died of disease,
starvation or executions that happened nearly every day. What would have happened if my dad’s unit
would have gone there, instead of to the Aleutians? Would I still be who I am? Would I even be?
Dad
was reticent about sharing stories about the war, and after his death, we
realized that he had told some stories to only one son, and another story to
another son. (I don’t know if he shared anything with my sister.) He shared with my older brother, Michael, his
experience with fighting the Japanese on one of the islands. I’m not sure which island or exactly when,
but what he told my brother was this: at some point, their morning detail was
to go to the beach and bayonet the dead bodies of Japanese soldiers lying on
the sand, with the hope of killing—or at least discovering—the live soldiers
that hid among the corpses.
My
dad would have been around 30 when that happened, so he was a youth. He had been through enough tough stuff in his
life: the Dust Bowl and Depression, riding the rails, working in the CCC, being
without a home, essentially for a period of time. He wasn’t a naïve kid just off the farm. But still, that experience of bayoneting the
dead must have been very traumatic.
(You
can read my poem that touches on this “You
Are My Father, My Son”, at my MN Artists page at: http://www.mnartists.org/Patrick_Cabello_Hansel). The next to
the last stanza reads:
I witness this day
with my hands:
your stomach turning,
your young
eyes grinding down, as
you
walk along the
Aleutian shoreline,
turning each face
over, one by one.
My
dad was not like some vets, who sought out the companionship of others who had
served in that way—he never went to VFW events, for example, that I
remember. As he got older, and became
more spiritual, what I saw in him was a both a resignation that he did what had
to be done during the war, and a recognition that he needed forgiveness. He was proud of his service in defeating fascism,
but as he told me once, in pain, “sometimes in war you have to do things you
know are wrong”.
There
has been so much emphasis on “Support the Troops” over the last couple decades;
I suppose that some of that has to do with our national grief and shame that we
didn’t support the troops coming back from Viet Nam like we should have. I can’t imagine that anyone would not want to
support their family members or friends or even strangers who are sent to war
by us. But its simplicity and the way it
is hammered over and over into us, especially during the holidays hide some
unpleasant truths.
One
of those truths is that there are things our troops do in our name that should
not be supported: invading countries under false pretenses, killing civilians, propping
up unjust governments (as in Afghanistan).
I fully realize that war is never clean, and that international issues
are very complicated. But I am afraid that
the impetus to support our troops can be so easily manipulated by leaders who
desire war for all the wrong reasons.
In
the time prior to the beginning of the second Iraq war, we lived in
Philadelphia, and there were competing demonstrations, often on the same
day. The signs at the demonstrations
against the invasion were mostly “No War” or “War is Not the Answer” and so
on. The only signs I ever saw at the pro-war
rallies were “Support Our Troops”. This
was ostensibly during the time when we as a nation, and Congress in particular were
deciding whether to go to war in the first place. “Our troops” were not even there yet. We claimed we were working internationally to
stop the Weapons of Mass Destruction (that’s a whole ‘nother post, or a bunch
of them).
I
am glad that Saddam Hussein is no longer in power, but I am not glad of the
civil war our invasion generated, nor of the atrocities committed in our
name. Too often we cling to our belief
that we are righteous and just. That
doesn’t just belong to the present. There
is a movement now to reframe the Viet Nam war as something just. It wasn’t. 1 million people died during our
occupation. We dropped more bombs on
Viet Nam than all the bombs dropped by all the nations in World War II. We defoliated half the country. All to
support a regime that tortured its people, and stole its resources.
There
is no doubt that many of our troops fought bravely and selflessly in both Viet
Nam and Iraq. There is no doubt that
many of our troops suffered, and still suffer terribly. We should not forget
them, and we should do everything in our power to help them. But there is also no doubt that our troops—in
our name—did terrible things. Honoring
them as heroes won’t help them get passed those particular wounds of war, and
it won’t make us a better people, a more just nation. There has to be a deeper healing, a more
thorough accounting of what we have done as a people.
I
believe that part of that has to do with reconciliation. Those countries that have, and continue to
have ways of bringing out the truth, and practicing reconciliation can be a
guide. I think of South Africa, northern
Ireland, Argentina and so forth. Their
processes aren’t perfect, but where it has worked it has given perpetrators the
chance to confess and victims the chance to hear, and if they choose, to
forgive. (For those of us who are
Christians, isn’t confession and forgiveness at the heart of what we believe?
And yet, we rarely use it when it comes to veterans.)
There
are many calls to “hug a vet”, “welcome a vet home” and so on. We can and should do that. But I would like to issue a call today to “forgive
a vet”. We can’t do that in isolation
from the pain and suffering they go through, and we can’t do that cleanly without
confessing our role in supporting the wars, paying for the wars, not working hard
enough to stop the wars.
I
don’t doubt that if you do this publicly, there may be a great deal of
pushback. It’s hard for any of us to admit we’ve wronged another, and it’s
especially hard for groups of people, whether it be a church, an institution or
a nation. But I think it may work to
bring healing and freedom, in the truest sense.
I’m willing to try it.
Be
justice. Be beauty. Be forgiveness.
Patrick
Patrick, you write so beautifully. Thanks for linking me to your blog. I look forward to continuing to read it.
ReplyDelete