If
we knew a man who told one woman after another that they “felt a connection”
and then made out with them, and had “sex” with them, only to dump them, we
would call him a serial predator. And if
the 3rd or 4th woman in line to receive this treatment thought
that she would “be the one to change him”, we would challenge her for impaired
thinking. We might warn her about
getting involved with a guy like that; our warnings likely would not be heeded
until he had moved onto to the next woman.
And our friend would cry on our shoulder and say, “I really thought he
was the one.” And we would comfort them
and restrain the part of us that wanted to remind them of our conversations
prior to her experience with Mister One.
All
this reasoning and support goes out the window when Romance gets
televised. We see the “happy couples”
going for romantic dinners; we see them paragliding over the falls of an exotic
island, where obsequious colorful indigenous folk wait to offer them a towel
(or is that Survivor or the Amazing Race?).
I’ve heard my daughters say that they would love to go out with that man
who is so “hot”, or go on that romantic getaway.
I
have nothing against infatuation or falling in love. My wife and I did over 25 years ago, and it’s
been a blessing. But I do have trouble
with the promotion of love as something you can buy or win. And I do have trouble with the way the images
are connected to make it seem like it was spontaneous, magical, and therefore
real. (My friend Sheila O’Conner, who is
a novelist, points out that the so-called “reality” shows are as scripted, if
not more so than any other work of fiction.
And in TV, they are cheaper to make because you don’t need to employ
many actual writers.)
Fantasy
is not reality. Which is why I think the
real danger of pornography is not only the fantasy that sex and love can be
purchased and consumed. Perhaps a more
deadly kind of pornography is the kind we see year after year, in James Bond
movies, in Sylvester Stallone movies, in video game after video game where the
object is to kill as many people as possible.
“Call of Duty” is a fantasy: that violence is good, fun and even
redemptive. It’s a dangerous fantasy
because it reinforces our cultural belief that violence solves all
conflicts. James Bond kills the
enemy. Stallone kills the bad guys. End of story. Not the robust kind of
reflection we need in our morality.
“But
it’s just a game, Patrick!” “But it’s
just harmless fun to watch The Bachelor!”
I’m not saying there is a direct causal relationship between watching
porn or playing a violent game and then raping or killing someone. I am saying that these games reinforce deep
cultural pillars about the commodification of sex and the blessings of violence.
Besides,
have we run out of games? Have we run
out of real stories? Are there no rubber
balls or sticks or things to make puppets with?
Is there no history, personal or social, that inspires us?
In
the ongoing debate about gun violence, one thing I would like to challenge
people to do is to say, publicly and with humility: “I won’t watch this stuff.
I won’t participate. And this is why: it’s demeaning to the love we have and to
our imagination. I don’t judge you if
you do. I invite you to talk about what
this means to us.”
That’s
not the only step, of course, but cutting out one of the roots of our societal
addiction to manipulative sex and cavalier violence might help.
Be
justice. Be beauty. And be reality, be
story, be love that does not consume, but celebrates.
Patrick
No comments:
Post a Comment